Tag Archives: web

On the horizon for K-12 | 2013

This year’s Horizon Report K-12 is out now…Check out the introductory video below:

It’s always useful to look up beyond the parapet at international shifts and trends and consider what the implications might be for educators and students. And then we ask ourselves,’ so what?’ What does this mean for me, my school, my students?

So, here’s my take on the ‘so what?’

No surprises

Cloud computing and mobile devices are one year or less away in terms of the 20% integration considered as the benchmark for adoption. Those of us in schools can see the trends toward BYOD, storage and use of cloud-based software and the proliferation of apps. Anyone with a smartphone will already recognise the opportunities to place user-experience in the driver’s seat for learning.

The questions for schools relate to how to best harness this type of technology in ways that put all learners’ strengths and needs first, rather than worry about the school down the road. A clear vision for the curriculum, for pedagogy and a PD plan for teachers, as well as giving consideration to digital citizenship should all be front and centre. Working hand-in-hand with the school community on this is vital.

Check out the BYOD in Schools group in the VLN Groups network to talk about this with colleagues across NZ and beyond.

Points to ponder

The prediction that big data related to learning analytics and open content are only a couple of years out from penetration are of interest.

The ability to analyse data gathered in student management systems and LMSs presents the opportunity to tailor the learning experiences of young people more precisely and responsively. How schools ensure they gather the information that is of most use in this kind of decision making will be a key question for schools. The open source movement offers exciting possibilities for the sharing of resources, of practice, of knowledge development as well as access to international information and data sets that can inform learning and inquiry.

On the far horizon sit the maker culture, with 3D printers and virtual laboratories that offer opportunities to prototype, test, trial and develop scientific thinking in ways that would have been beyond the cost of schools a few years ago. The large of number of 3D printers at this year’s Makerspace in Wellington (check out the Makertorium) was a reflection of what might be possible in schools  in terms of creation, design and construction.

 Social trends

Driving these trends are 6 movements which, in some ways, are of more interest than the technologies themselves:

  1. “Education paradigms are shifting to include online learning, hybrid learning, and  collaborative models.

  2. Social media is changing the way people interact, present ideas and information, and  communicate.

  3. Openness — concepts like open content, open  data, and open resources, along with notions  of transparency and easy access to data and  information — is becoming a value.

  4. As the cost of technology drops and school  districts revise and open up their access policies,  it is becoming more common for students to bring their own mobile devices

  5. The abundance of resources and relationships  made easily accessible via the Internet  is challenging us to revisit our roles as  educators. “

How can we turn the challenges into opportunities?

How might we…

  • redesign professional learning so it is sustainable and a valued part of the school’s culture?
  • look at the new pathways that are opening up for schools, and see past the more traditional modes that may not always have the individual learner at the heart?
  • integrate blended practices into learning, particularly assessment practices?
  • harness technologies so students are working from positions of strength?

Connected learning | Making learning inclusive and meaningful

This is a quick share of a recent report on the ways in which technology can enhance learning that is:

“socially embedded, interest-driven, and oriented toward educational, economic, or political opportunity.”

infographic exploring the connected learning framework

The report - Connected Learning: An Agenda for Research and Design (Digital Media and Learning Research Hub) – sets out to explore ways in which technology can be an enabler for learning that allows individual students to engage in ways that are inclusive and meaningful. It includes case studies of students who were able to explore their individual passions as avenues towards higher learning. Like Clarissa and her love of writing, or Louis who was disconnected from school but who was able to forge links back to learning through hip-hop. There is a strong focus on groups of students who are marginalised or not traditionally able to invest themselves in school.

Key ideas here are that learning that is connected to passions is

  • peer-supported, interest-driven and can be academically oriented
  • that technologies can support production, networking and shared purposes
  • interconnected through constant challenge participation and active application of knowledge
  • enabled by new media because it fosters self expression, increases accessibility to opportunities, expands social supports and can build capacity.

The report draws attention to the growing learning divide, changing nature of knowledge and its implications for the workforce, and the types of media that young people have access to. Its discussion of how education can draw on technologies to enable embedded socially supported learning is grounded in socio-cultural and situated learning theories.

“Our learning approach is guided by three key findings that have emerged
from this body of learning research:

  1. a disconnect between classroom and everyday learning,
  2. the meaningful nature of learning that is embedded in valued relationships, practice, and culture, and
  3. the need for learning contexts that bring together in-school and out-of-school learning and activity.”

One of the most useful parts of this report, other than the case studies, is the frameworks the report offers to prompt discussion and review of current learning environments.  These would make useful discussion foci in schools that are reviewing their vision and strategic direction  or for teachers looking to redefine learning to engagement disconnected students.

The concluding comments speak strongly of socially-driven motivators for change:

“Our argument is that for too many young people—particularly our most vulnerable populations of youth— their formal education is disconnected to the other meaningful social contexts in their everyday life, whether that is peer relations, family life, or their work and career aspirations. The connected learning model posits that by focusing educational attention on the links between different spheres of learning—peer culture, interests and academic subjects—we can better support interest-driven and meaningful learning in ways that take advantage of the democratizing potential of digital networks and online resources. We recognize the grim economic conditions and the challenges that educational institutions face, while at the same time seeking to articulate a positive way forward that mitigates rather than exacerbates today’s educational inequities.

Online information and social media provide opportunities for radically expanding the entry points and pathways to learning, education, and civic engagement. Further, there is a groundswell of activity in diverse sectors that are taking to these connected learning opportunities, ranging from entrepreneurial young learners, open and online educational initiatives, technology innovations in gaming and other forms of learning media, new forms of activism, and innovative schools and libraries.”

____________________________________________

Ito, Mizuko, Kris Gutiérrez, Sonia Livingstone, Bill Penuel, Jean
Rhodes, Katie Salen, Juliet Schor, Julian Sefton-Green, S. Craig
Watkins. 2013. Connected Learning: An Agenda for Research and
Design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.

Tapscott at TED: Four principles for an open world

Highly recommended summary of four “big ideas” that underpin the development of the web, from the author of Growing Up Digital and Macrowikinomics.

Need three reasons to watch?

  1. Tapscott’s fluent linking of stories to illustrate the exponential development of the web, and the shifts in the way we now think about collaboration, transparency, embracing the commons, and the way it can lead to empowerment.
  2. The concept of organisations as naked, open to the world and better for it in these straightened times as long as they understand the need for integrity and our trust.
  3. The stunning analogy towards the end of the murmuration of starlings.

Go watch.

Should we design for mobile by default?

Laid table at Xmas by WroteInteresting argument for not rushing into designing for mobile, from Richard Millington of The Online Community Guide: When To Design For Mobile – The Online Community Guide.

He analyses the figures for mobile use in the US, and the traffic via mobile to his blog. With the figures at <10%, he figures that there’s no rush to design for mobile, and that it’s better to focus on the platform that the majority of users are using.

And that’s certainly one view – and he has evidence to back to it up.

If you think about designing online information points as if you were designing a meal, how would you start? If I invite people over for a meal, I’m not just going to cook a roast if I know that a guest is vegetarian. I’ll sort out a meal that offers a great experience for everyone, not cook a chook, and quickly add on a shop-bought nut roast as an afterthought.

So, in terms of designing for all devices, including mobile,  how about the view that:

  • If 10% of folk want to access information via a device of their choice then they should be able to.
  • If a disability or other reason that might limit your web access means that you are reliant on mobile, then you shouldn’t be disenfranchised from using it.
  • Mobile access is often the cheapest – sometimes only – form that people can get their hands on, so they should be considered, too.

Ultimately, I guess I am thinking about the philosophical argument that, when we design information for others to read, we should start by designing for everyone, as a starting point. This is a key idea in Universal Design for Learning (UDL) (and thanks to Chrissie Butler at CORE Education for all the great conversations on this topic).

But whatever you call, it, I still think we should design for all, not just the majority, whatever the data tells us.

Thoughts?

[Image source: Wrote]

Can I borrow your online conversation? | Ethics online

Is it ok to walk into someone’s garden and take a photo? How about take a plant? What about walking up to their front door, standing in their porch and listen to the conversation through the keyhole? Would it be ok if you were listening to a conversation standing on the pavement?

Where does the ‘privacy’ begin and the ‘public’ end?

I’ve been exploring the ethical implications of researching in a community space online – and the waters are pretty murky. My thesis will be exploring a social network, one in which I am already a member, an active participant. So already, I have more than one role, access to a range of other people’s information and have different relationships with people who are there for learning (not for the pleasure of my research;-).

But there is no denying that social sciences research in online spaces presents some interesting issues, simply due to

  • the greater accessibility to data,
  • looser management of privacy and confidentiality,
  • difficulties with identity and informed consent,
  • multiple cultures across global settings, and
  • the range of ‘venues‘ that present different challenges (Ess, 2004).

I like the idea that online research is essentially participatory – focused on doing good for a community, a collaborative act (Denzin, 2004), and I strongly believe that a community (online or otherwise) has a set of values and culture that existed long before the research begins, and therefore must be acknowledged and assimilated into the research.

There are clear overlaps with feminist research and critical theory (Cohen et al, 2007). In other words, if I am going to research in an online space, I should be all about goodwill, democratic rights with a clear sense of producing something that will somehow point towards a way to improve or enhance what is already there, working alongside participants.

The ethical issues, then, are beginning to emerge clearly for me:

  • tension between the power relationships inherent in my roles of researcher, paid facilitator and community member
  • notions of public vs private? – Posts made by others in a public forum for a specific purpose are not ‘fair game’, nor were they intended for a research purposes.
  • The way that others’ posts might be analysed and interpreted – the importance of the context.
  • Copyright and fair use issues
  • Informed consent
I’ve now submitted my ethics application, so fingers crossed.
[Image source: AttributionNoncommercialShare Alike Some rights reserved by DCRC-UWE]

Social media: Digital dialogue with DK

Yes, he’s a mate and a colleague….and so, having declared my interest, I’ll say, without feeling at all ‘promotional’ that the CORE breakfast session this Friday morning with DK on social media was spot on. Here’s why:

  • Social media was foregrounded in the bigger picture, the context of the development of the web, all the way from the O’Reilly’s brain through the ‘happy ugly’ of MySpace (great video from Ze Frank) to the exciting possibilities of today’s social web for both learners and teachers.
  • Great images: always more powerful to use a visual metaphor than a bunch of bullets.
  • Big, fat philosophy. Open, sharing, enthusiastic advocacy for the power of the collective. Social media as digital dialogue that can be efficiently managed so we can choose to hear our favourite signals amidst the noise.
  • Humour. Laughs. Wry self-deprecation.
  • Great collection of tweets all the way through…
More, please.

Rethinking education: New video from Mike Wesch

I’m a bit of a fan of Professor Wesch. I like the way he captures some of the big picture ideas that sit at the point where technology and anthropology meet.

In his most recent video (a conversation starter produced for an EDUCAUSE book, The Tower and the Cloud: Higher Education in the Age of Cloud Computing, edited by Richard Katz), he explores the way peer collaboration and knowledge creation in our web 2.0 world pose serious implications for the way we regard knowledge and publications at university. And in school.

Interesting comments about the way links work instead of a hierarchy online, that there is no ‘top’ to the web, and that we need a more open approach to the concept of knowledge because we live in a sphere that is far wider and more open than before.

A teacher who encourages students to develop opinions on a wiki, or review and critique a blog post on a news item, for example, will know this already…that it is better to be open and prepare students to become discerning digital citizens of what’s out there online than deny them the opportunities that web 2.0 presents.

And if you haven’t seen Wesch’s other video think pieces, check out his YouTube channel.

Thanks to dangerously irrelevant and Free Technology for Teachers for the link:-)

Wave goodbye…

We were big adopters of Google Wave at work, even in its BETA version.

We thrilled at the excitement of synchronised editing from different places in the country. We were intrigued by the action replay of what we had composed. We found it a great way to live blog from conferences, creating back channels that exceeded 140 characters. Version control and the multiple ‘FW’ email was a thing of the past. We liked ‘getting stuff done with people’ (snappy, Google, snappy).

I liked being part of a new technology. And I liked that fact that my work liked that, too. I even liked the excitement of finally being invited when I had waited so long for an invite.  Ah, happy days….

But, it’s goodbye to the Wave [BBC news story]. And, despite all the promise of mutual editing sessions and parachuting into discussions, a bit of me isn’t too sorry to see Wave slosh off into the horizon.

I won’t miss the lack of export function from Word – because your writing can’t stay surfing the wave forever.

I won’t miss importing text and watching my formatting turn to spaghetti. Sigh.

I won’t miss the trickiness of inviting people, even after they opened up the Wave to just anyone;-) Not everyone wants to be on gMail, y’know.

And how often do you need to write at exactly the same time as someone else? Not as often as we thought, is the answer.

Back to the wiki, I guess, where at least anyone can find it, anyone can write in it, I can copy and paste tidily – and I can make letters spin if I want to.

3 reasons why online privacy is the best gift you can give your children

I was recently asked to complete a survey about children (say, under 13) and blogs: are they are good idea (blogs, not the children)? Is there a benefit in children blogging, what are the issues and so on. I have also had a conversation this week about people posting photos of their children online behind limited or no privacy settings.

Is this post a hysterical reaction – or common sense? Here are three good reasons why you should think twice before sharing your children with the world:

1. Our children have not chosen to be online

This one is pretty obvious. Little humans they may be (and gosh, they can be annoying at times), but they still have rights. Even schools have to cover themselves, with various permission forms, before they post images of students online. Should parents consider similar issues?  Even if our children enjoy seeing themselves online, they have no idea of the ramifications of the internet and cannot know what it means to see themselves on the web.

2. We cannot control the information we post up

Yes, we can choose our settings and our controls. We can tick the boxes and run checks. But once the photo is in the cloud, it’s there, somewhere in the ether, forever. How large a digital footprint do we want to create for our children without their say so?

3. It is scarily easy to track people down via information on the web

Is it too much to suggest that an identified child on the net is the same as a child wearing a t-shirt bearing their name, address etc, wandering around in a big city? We do not know who sees our images or our children’s images, who stores our information, or how easily we can be found. So, yes, you wouldn’t want your child to have their name, address, location or school linked to their image even if you have decided to post their photos up there.

Yet, here’s the rub.

We live in an online world, and we share our lives with our loved ones via the web as naturally as we used to send them copies of the school photos in the mail. We are a highly mobile lot, who rarely live close to our folks anymore. What about Grandma in the UK who never sees her grandchildren? Or the ante-natal group of mums who bond online, sharing news, views and shots of their bubs doing mad stuff, to keep themselves sane?

I  would be recommending the obvious: if images of your children must be posted online, ensure you have the tightest security settings you can, don’t refer to them by name and give all that personal information a second thought.

Let your children define their own digital shadow when they are old enough. Then at least, when we are lecturing – sorry, supporting –  them about cybersafety, we can say we tried to set an example back in the day…;-)

[Image source: WoodcraftPlans.com]