Tag Archives: student_voice

From voice to dialogue | Meaningful student voice

voices shouting in a crowdToday, thanks to Te Toi Tupu, I was really lucky to hear Dr. Rachel McNae, University of Waikato, speak about how we use (and exploit?) student voice in schools.

She managed to weave in poetry with Judy Brown’s  ’Fire’, a story about setting fire to the Brownie Guide toadstool and the ‘Another Brick in the Wall’ Pink Floyd video so she had me engaged right through!;) We also tried ways to gather voice anonymously with feedback tools e.g. PollEverywhere,  Wiffiti, ExciteM

We examined the way young people can be involved meaningfully in learning conversations rather than harvesting data.

Rachel’s opening story about setting fire to the Brownie toadstool in KeriKeri (!) highlighted the way some people rebel against a system where they don’t  fit. She asked : How often do our students today feel they fit in, or not? Think about the culture we create and how we can engage teachers to think about students’ sense of place and identity in our schools.

She posed some great questions for us to consider:

  1. In terms of the acoustics of a school, whose voices are heard and whose are silenced? Teachers often fill the space out of fear of what students might say when we talk to them. Why do we enter the space first?
  2. What shape can student voice take? Is it used to create further change and generate further agency? How can we shift from instructional to pedagogical?
  3. How can we support the creation of professional communities that are relational? Create sustainable sense of agency?

 Key points from the research

  • We don’t rate student voice highly – youth is a stigma, needing to be moulded
  • We over utilise student voice in the design of cafe menus and logos but not in curriculum development
  • When students feel their voices are valued, they develop a strong sense of membership, agency, respect, self-worth, sense of self and place as a learner – and more likely to become engaged as a result
  • They have unique perspectives which should be integrated into the learning
  • We often use brainstorms etc at the start but students prefer one to one conversation so that their voices are heard. Check out Mitra’s pyramid for student voice re ways to build student relationships.

An ethic of care

When we talk to students…

  • Be aware of power imbalance between teachers and students. Offer choice to share voices in ways that suit their culture and preferences.
  • Students are aware if their voices won’t make a difference – how will it be used as evidence for change? How much are we using it to reinforce trends, compliance, and productivity?
  • To do student voice using different structure takes time and care to bring about change, and to challenge existing discourses and structures.

Questions for reflection

  • Reflect on own practice.
  • How do we engage students and teachers in learning conversations, about learning?
  • What opportunities can we create and share?
  • To what extent do we create space for students to take the reins to move from gathering evidence to changing pedagogical practices? > ako, progressive autonomy, accountability to students, acknowledge diversity of voice, from voice to dialogue.

Useful resources

  • ‘Why won’t they listen to us?’ - Grover > makes the point that collecting student voice in traditionally authoritarian schools remain supremely difficult
  • Adam Fletcher soundout.org > involving students meaningfully and inclusively.
  • Ladder of participation (Hart, 1992) > scaffold conversations so they become more meaningful

ladder of participation

Examples from NZ studies

[Image credits: CC Thomas Hawk]

ICT and learning: 5 myths – busted!

A recent conference I attended was a hotbed of exciting ideas, inspirational speakers and wonderful stories. Many of these focused on how to make the most of what technology can offer the learner.

But whispered amongst the enthusiastic conversation and bubbling excitement, there lurked a handful of myths.

Myths that need busting.

  • MYTH 1: All students are Gen Z, they use technology all the time, they’re all on Facebook and so teachers should be too.
No, they’re not. Some of them are. Some of them are on MSN, MySpace, Twitter, their phones…some are on all, and some are on none (Check out the Pew Report, from 2010).  The concept of ‘digital natives’ has been debunked. And it’s naive to make blanket assumptions about learners. We should do our own research on our own students, be more nuanced as we plan learning with them. They’ll tell us where they are, what they like, how they like to learn. And they’ll appreciate it far more than being signed up for a site where they don’t want to be for a lesson that is driven by some mythical assumption about how young people learn. Myth: Busted!

Would you change the way you use language to keep your friends?

Love this video from the National Union of Teachers (UK) – please tell me things have changed a bit since then! –  and while it might seem archaic, it might be an interesting jumping off point for students to think about how they adapt what they say, and write, when online and off.

Discussion points might include:

  • The way we use different language styles according to context
  • The pressure of one’s peers to change your behaviour
  • Different generations and the shifts in language and behaviour

 

Tell me you see a difference between board and screen..?

If there is no difference, then we need to talk.

This video by mokmcdaniel – Online Student Experience – highlights in grim tones, how depressing it is to be in a world in which exciting teaching and learning (with and without technology) is possible, but not happening for him.

While part of me can appreciate the drama and heightened negativity that this skilled filmmaker has amplified, part of me wonders how prevalent this kind of teaching is.

Just replacing a board with a screen, a pen with a keyboard, is clearly not the answer.

So what is? Where would you start?

Thanks to the Committed Sardine for the link.

The customer is always right…..

I’m sure you’ve all been waiting with baited breath for the results of last post’s question…..so here is a convoluted response…

Last week, I was sitting in Wellington airport, enjoying a quiet moment with a Fuel latte and taking advantage of the free Internet access (just joking, Wild at Heart).

The taxi driver, on my way there, asked me which route I’d prefer to the airport. The cheerful barrista at aforementioned coffee emporium checked to see if I wanted large or regular, one shot or two, sugar…(not, am sweet enough).

And a teacher with which I recently worked on a themed unit, asked her students:
“What do you think about this?”
“Which texts would you like to start with?”
“Would you prefer to study this independently?”
“Which type of response suits the way you work: digital essay, oral presentation or blog?”

As you can see, the busy voices in my head have been considering the importance of ‘student voice’ and trying to make connections between a range of seemingly disparate sources – and before you log off with mutterings of ‘oh, not that hackneyed soapbox’, the idea of actually talking to students about their own education does seem to be emerging more and more frequently, from a range of quarters. And it is the surprise at this apparently novel idea that grabs me the most.

I wonder if there is such a focus on control of every aspect of own lives (Victoria Beckham Syndrome, Sunday Star Times, 18/11/07) that we forget that young people might also want to be in control of theirs? Or at least have a say. And yet many people, including educational professionals, find it a surprising idea that we should consult our ‘customers’ before we serve them up an Mc-Education. Do they want to super-size their group work? Would they like a novel on teenage angst, with some poetry on the side? How about a choice of different flavoured multi-media presentations?

Damien Wilkins’ description in the recent English in Aotearoa rang a few sad and somnolent bells:

“Schools are places in which status is seen at its most naked. The truth about almost every school in the world is obvious to those who have eyes to see: teachers are high status, students are low status. This is the foundation upon which the school is built, literally and metaphorically. Literally, in that the architecture emphasises this truth at every turn. Metaphorically, in that the school depends upon this hierarchy being preserved.

Why are we surprised that students are depressed, frustrated, angry and alienated by their school experiences? The wonder is that so many of them are good-natured about school. Their benevolence is remarkable, when one considers that for 13 years they are treated with a gross lack of courtesy. Truly was it said in England in the 19th century that the mark of a man was the way he treated his servants. In the 21st century, the mark of adults is the way they treat children.

In many schools the students are not even allowed to use the main entrance, the front door. They are apparently too scruffy or noisy or smelly to be allowed in the million-dollar foyer. They are given hard uncomfortable seats, or made to sit on the floor. Their ablutions blocks are often filthy and even unsafe. They are moved in mobs, while teachers shout directions like farmers working their dogs….We should didactically teach status to our students, including ways in which the status messages they give others will determine many outcomes in life….”

How do we listen to our students? How do we give them authentic voice and authentic choice?

The newly-released NZ Curriculum, with its learner-centred pedagogy and practice almost demands we consult with our learners. Recent comments from Derek Wenmouth [check out his Derek's Blog on this page] reflect similar concerns.

Those of you familiar with Ewan McIntosh and the Bass Player Blog [see blogroll] know full well that the voices are out there. If the schools in which we work are not engaging with those voices, then we need to find ways in which we can.

Because if we don’t make sure our customers get what they want and need, the customers will go somewhere else….